Kenneth Keith Official Site

policy recommendations for reducing violence

Reducing Violence: Policy Recommendations

—

by

Kenneth Keith
in

In 2022, gun violence in the US led to over 48,000 deaths. This had a big effect on kids and communities of color. Dr. Vivek Murthy, the US Surgeon General, says gun violence is a public health issue. He calls for more research, rules on guns, and support for mental health.

This shows how gun violence hits different groups hard. It’s clear we need to act fast to keep everyone safe, especially our young people.

Key Takeaways

  • Use proven methods to make communities safer, with advice from experts in crime studies, research, and making policies.
  • Look at violence from many angles with policy ideas like stricter alcohol laws, better policing, and school programs.
  • Focus on making policies based on data and working together across agencies to fight violence well.
  • Give power to communities and support young people to tackle violence’s deep causes like poverty and past trauma.
  • Keep updating policies to match new research and what communities really need.

Stricter Alcohol Policies

Alcohol is often linked to violence, with over 40% of violent crimes involving it. Stricter alcohol policies can help reduce violence and deaths, including those from firearms.

Higher Alcohol Tax

Studies show that higher taxes on alcohol can lower crime rates. If the U.S. had stricter alcohol policies, there could be up to 1,200 fewer homicides a year. This highlights how making alcohol more expensive can help.

Reducing the Number of Alcohol Outlets

More alcohol outlets mean more violence. Being close to places that sell alcohol can lead to more crime and risky drinking. Limiting where alcohol is sold can help reduce violence.

Revoking Alcohol Offenders’ Right to Drink

South Dakota’s “24/7 Sobriety” program makes offenders stay sober to reduce crime and violence. This shows how limiting alcohol access can help fight violence.

Dealing with violence means focusing on stricter alcohol rules. These steps can save lives and make communities safer.

Hot-Spot Policing

Hot-spot policing is a data-driven strategy to fight violence and improve safety. It uses police resources in high-crime areas to cut down crime and violence. This method aims to make a big difference in these specific spots.

This approach works well because it brings people together. Police, residents, families, and business owners work as a team. They figure out what these crime hot spots need and find ways to fix the problems.

Many studies show that hot-spot policing really works. It can lower crime without pushing it somewhere else. The community partnerships formed during this process often get a positive response from locals, making the program even more effective.

A review of 44 studies found that hot-spot policing cuts violence by about 14% on average. In some places in the UK, violent crime went down by 37% to 74% with more police and community involvement.

This method is also cost-effective. It doesn’t take a lot of money but can lead to big gains in public safety and less crime. By focusing on the most crime-ridden areas, police can make a lasting impact on crime and disorder.

As communities deal with violence, hot-spot policing is a hopeful solution. It combines evidence-based policing and strong community partnerships. This way, law enforcement and communities can work together for a safer future.

Focused Deterrence Policing

Focused deterrence policing targets specific issues like drug dealing and gang violence. It focuses on the main individuals and groups causing problems. This method works closely with community groups to make it clear what the legal and community consequences are for violence.

It also offers help and social services as alternatives to a life of crime.

Community Involvement

Community involvement is key in focused deterrence policing. By working with local groups and leaders, police can understand the root causes of violence. This helps build trust between the community and the police, which is vital for the program’s success.

Offering Alternatives to Violence

This policing approach sends a strong message about violence’s consequences. It also gives people a way out by offering social services. These services include counseling, treatment for substance abuse, and help with housing, education, and finding a job.

This support aims to equip individuals with the tools to change their lives for the better.

Studies show that focused deterrence can really cut down on crime. The “Boston Miracle” in the 1990s is a great example of this. Boston saw a big drop in youth homicides thanks to this approach. Other programs like Operation Ceasefire and the Boston Gun Project have also shown its effectiveness in fighting serious violence.

“Focused deterrence strategies have shown effectiveness in reducing crime in high-risk areas, lowering individuals’ risk of involvement in serious crimes, and potentially improving community relations when implemented in partnership with communities.”

Raise the Age or Grade for Dropping Out of School

Keeping students in school for longer could help reduce crime and violence. A study in the American Economic Journal shows that making it harder to drop out can lower crime rates.

This research says that more time in school changes how students act. It makes them less likely to commit crimes. It’s not just that they’re naturally better. This shows how education and safety are closely linked.

Targeted education policies could really help fight community violence.

Statistic Percentage
Adolescents at risk of negative behaviors 25%
8th graders spending 2+ hours alone after school 27%
Juvenile violent crimes occurring after school Most

Keeping youth in positive activities and with adults to watch over them is key. By making it harder to drop out, we can cut down on crime and violence. This makes communities safer and more prosperous.

“Providing opportunities, skills, and recognition can lead to healthy behaviors among youth.”

The Social Development Strategy points out how important it is to support and engage young people. By keeping students in school longer, we can use education to make our communities safer and healthier.

Set a Clear Goal: Commit to Saving Lives

City leaders must set a clear goal to reduce violence. They should aim to save lives by cutting down on homicide and non-fatal shooting rates. They should aim for a 10% drop each year in these rates.

It’s important to track real results, not just what’s done. In Boston, a focused strategy cut youth homicides by 63%. Oakland saw gun homicides drop by 31% and group shootings by 43% with this approach.

But, the situation is still serious. In 2020, 77% of homicides involved guns, up from 73% the year before. The rate of solving homicides fell from 82% in 1976 to 50% in 2020. This is a big problem for Black communities, where solving homicides was only 47% compared to 63% for whites.

By setting clear goals, city leaders can unite their communities and use resources wisely. They must commit to cutting homicide and non-fatal shooting rates. This is key to any strong anti-violence plan.

Identify Key People and Places Driving Violence

To cut down on violent crime, cities need a detailed violence analysis. They must look at who, what groups, and where most violence happens. This means checking incident data, police info, and social networks to find high-risk individuals and hot spot mapping risky areas.

Working with street outreach workers and non-police groups is key. They help check the findings and guide joint efforts. The Strategic Approaches to Community Safety Initiative (SACSI) saw violent crime drop by up to 50% in some cities.

In Boston, MA, Operation Ceasefire led to less youth homicide and fewer gun assaults. It also cut down on police calls and recovered guns. Hot spots policing worked well, lowering crime and violent crimes.

The Chicago Alternative Policing Strategy (CAPS) made crime and police calls go down in some areas. The Comprehensive Anti-Gang Initiative (CAGI) also cut gang-related gun homicides in some cities.

Intervention Outcome
Strategic Approaches to Community Safety Initiative (SACSI) Up to 50% reduction in targeted violent crimes
Operation Ceasefire in Boston, MA Reductions in youth homicide, citywide gun assaults, calls for service, and recovered new guns
Hot spots policing Effective in reducing overall crime, Promising in reducing violent, property, public order, and drug and alcohol offenses
Chicago Alternative Policing Strategy (CAPS) Statistically significant reductions in crime and calls to 911 in police beats that implemented the program
Comprehensive Anti-Gang Initiative (CAGI) Significant reduction in gun homicides related to gang crime in cities where the initiative was implemented

By focusing on key people and places, cities can target their efforts well. This helps in reducing crime and violence effectively.

Create a Citywide Plan for Engaging Key People and Places

Addressing violence reduction needs a well-coordinated effort. Leaders must make plans that focus on the most at-risk individuals and areas. These plans should use SMART criteria and highlight community partnerships between law enforcement and local communities.

About 34 cities have violence reduction units, but not all report to the mayor. The Violent Crime Working Group says it’s crucial to pinpoint key people and spots that cause violence. This should be done with hard data and accurate intel.

The goal is to cut homicides and non-fatal shootings by 10% each year. In the first half of 2023, the U.S. saw a 24% rise in homicides in 30 cities compared to before COVID-19. This shows the need for a strong violence reduction plan.

States and the federal government should back cities in their fight against violence. They should support local strategies that are based on evidence. By having a detailed, data-driven violence reduction plan, cities can tackle violence effectively. This plan should promote community partnerships and a multi-disciplinary response.

policy recommendations for reducing violence

To tackle the growing violent crime, we need a strong, evidence-based plan. This plan should include strict alcohol rules, focused police work, school programs, and working with the community. These strategies have shown they can really help when used together.

Here are the main parts of this plan:

  • Strict alcohol rules, like higher taxes and fewer places to buy alcohol, to cut down on alcohol misuse and violence.
  • Hot-spot policing focuses police on areas and people most involved in violent crime.
  • Focused deterrence programs use community support, alternative ways to solve problems, and police action to change bad behavior in high-risk groups.
  • Making it harder to drop out of school, since staying in school is linked to less violence.

Using evidence-based policies, working with the community, and tackling violence’s deep causes is the best way forward. This approach can greatly improve safety and lessen violent crime in our communities.

Intervention Description Evidence of Effectiveness
Stricter Alcohol Policies Increase in alcohol taxes, reduction in alcohol outlets Shown to reduce alcohol-related violence and other harms
Hot-Spot Policing Focusing law enforcement resources on high-crime locations Demonstrated reductions in violent crime in target areas
Focused Deterrence Coordinated law enforcement, community engagement, and social service provision Evidence of decreased gang violence and other serious crime
Raise Dropout Age Increasing minimum age or grade for leaving school Strong link between educational attainment and reduced violence

By using this community-engaged approach and these evidence-based policies in a holistic strategy, we can make big steps towards less violence and more safety in our communities.

“Reducing violence needs a full, team effort. We must tackle the social, economic, and structural issues that lead to it. A holistic strategy based on evidence-based policies and community engagement is key.”

Engage Key People with Empathy and Accountability

To reduce violence, we must reach out to high-risk individuals and groups with empathy and accountability. Community outreach workers are key in this effort. They help solve conflicts, connect people to important services, and act as links between the community and those who feel left out.

Cognitive behavioral interventions are also crucial. They help even the most hurt individuals start to heal and choose better paths. By changing negative thought patterns and behaviors, these programs help people stop seeking revenge and make better choices.

Outreach and Intervention Programs

  • Deploy community outreach workers to build trust and connect high-risk individuals to resources
  • Implement cognitive behavioral interventions to address the root causes of violent behavior
  • Offer comprehensive support services, including job training, mental health counseling, and addiction treatment

Focused Deterrence Strategies

Focused deterrence strategies work well in stopping future violence and ending cycles of revenge. They mix specific supports with strict rules. This sends a strong message that violence won’t be accepted, while showing ways for individuals to change for the better.

  1. Identify and engage the high-risk individuals driving violence in the community
  2. Offer a combination of services and accountability measures tailored to their specific needs
  3. Consistently communicate the consequences of continued violence and the opportunities for change

By using empathy, community-based programs, and focused deterrence, we can reach key people and stop the cycle of violence in our communities.

high-risk individuals

Address Key Locations Using Place-Based Policing and Investment

Fighting violence needs a complex plan that focuses on high-crime spots. Place-based policing and investing in the community can break the cycle of violence. This approach helps make areas safer.

Problem-Oriented Policing

Working together, police and locals are key to solving crime issues. By tackling the root causes of crime, we can stop violence. For instance, the Chicago Alternative Policing Strategy (CAPS) cut crime and 911 calls in certain areas.

Environmental Crime Approaches

Environmental crime approaches also help calm violent spots. Projects like cleaning-and-greening and fixing up areas make a big difference. In Boston, the Safe Street Teams (SST) program cut violent crimes in certain areas.

Long-term targeted investments in things like education and healthcare are crucial. These efforts, along with a focused policing and community safety plan, can bring real change to tough neighborhoods.

Program Key Findings
Operation Ceasefire (Boston) Statistically significant reductions in youth homicide, citywide gun assaults, calls for service, and recovered new guns
Hot Spots Policing Effective for reducing overall crime and promising for reducing specific offenses like violent, property, public order, and drug and alcohol offenses
Comprehensive Anti-Gang Initiative (CAGI) Significant reduction in gun homicides related to gang crime in cities where the initiative was implemented

“Place-based policing, combined with targeted investments in the community, can be an effective strategy to disrupt the cycle of violence in high-crime areas.”

Place Responsibility for Violence Reduction at the Top

Every city should have a permanent violence reduction unit in the mayor’s office to tackle high crime rates. These units offer direct services, manage funds, and lead anti-violence efforts citywide. Their success depends on mayoral leadership and good performance management of these violence reduction units.

Mayors can lead a coordinated, data-driven effort against violence by taking charge of these units. They should have top leaders reporting to the mayor. This ensures clear visibility, accountability, and quick access to key decisions.

Managing these units well is key. Focusing on results like lives saved, not just programs, can lead to lasting change. Regularly checking performance and adjusting strategies helps improve their impact and community outcomes.

“Every city confronting high rates of violent crime should have a permanent violence reduction unit operating within the mayor’s office, with senior leadership reporting directly to the mayor.”

With dedicated violence reduction units and strong mayoral leadership, cities can fight violence more effectively. By putting this effort at the top, mayors show they care about safety. This approach can lead to real, lasting cuts in violence.

Emphasize Healing with Trauma-Informed Approaches

Gun violence hits the poor and marginalized hard, causing post-traumatic stress and polyvictimization more than war veterans. We must focus on healing with trauma-informed care. This means understanding trauma’s effects and offering full support to those hurt by violence.

These approaches change the question from “What’s wrong with you?” to “What happened to you?” They show how abuse, neglect, and violence can lead to serious health issues and risky behaviors. By using trauma-informed care, healthcare workers can connect better with their patients. This could lead to better health outcomes and save money on healthcare and social services.

Creating a trauma-informed system means giving patients power, choice, and trust. It’s key to ending violence and helping victims recover and succeed.

“Trauma-informed care shifts the focus from ‘What’s wrong with you?’ to ‘What happened to you?’”

Trauma-Informed Strategies in Action

Across the country, places are using trauma-informed strategies to help victims and communities:

  • The Violent Crime Reduction Operations Guide shares crime-fighting methods, like trauma-aware interviews for police.
  • The Vicarious Trauma Toolkit supports first responders in dealing with their own trauma.
  • The Pathways Toward Collective Healing document shows how five communities are using trauma-informed care during violence.
  • Trauma-aware police tactics fight against intimidation and revenge in victims and communities.
  • The IACP’s work on police responses to kids exposed to violence tackles childhood trauma.

By using trauma-informed methods, communities can fully support those hurt by violence. This helps with healing and stops the cycle of being re-victimized.

Invest in Anti-Violence Workforce Development

Reducing violence means investing in an anti-violence workforce. This includes community-based organizations and others fighting violence. It’s key to build their capacity, skills, and long-term success. This can be done through training, technical help, and funding for growth and professional development.

Studies show we need a strong anti-violence team. Violence is often found in poor, neglected areas with more people of color. Poverty, alcohol outlets, empty buildings, and income gaps are linked to more violence. Helping community groups and their teams can tackle these deep issues.

Cities like Indianapolis and Philadelphia have shown how to build an anti-violence team. Indianapolis moved safety grants to job training, mentoring, and housing in high-crime areas. Philadelphia added funding for jobs and career support in community efforts. These efforts show how local groups and their teams can fight violence’s deep causes.

By focusing on anti-violence workforce development, leaders can make sure those fighting violence have what they need. They’ll have the resources, skills, and support to lower violence and make communities safer and stronger.

“Neighborhood attachment and social cohesion are associated with lower rates of violent crime, advocating for community cohesion and social relationships to alleviate violence.”

Set Aside Funding for New Stakeholders and Strategies

Dealing with community violence reduction funding is tough. It needs a mix of old and new ways to work. Cities should save money for new ideas and to learn from what works. This keeps them ready for changes in violence and community needs.

The Best Practices for Training Frontline Violence Intervention Workers brief shows why violence work is a health job. It needs special skills and standards. Giving money to this special group makes violence reduction better.

The Women in Policing: Breaking Barriers and Blazing a Path report talks about women in police work. More women in police can bring new ideas to fight community violence.

The Police Recruitment and Retention for the New Millennium report looks at how police keep and hire officers. Helping officers feel good and grow can make a strong police force. This helps cities improve their violence reduction work.

Funding Source FY 2023 Enacted FY 2024 Proposed Change
Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) $1.0 billion $1.0 billion $159.0 million increase
Office of Justice Programs (OJP) Discretionary Funding $2,937.8 million $3,373.9 million 15.1% increase
Office of Justice Programs (OJP) Mandatory Funding $2,037.0 million $2,283.0 million 11.9% increase

These budget plans show the government’s big support for violence reduction funding. They help both old and new ways to fight community violence. By working with new groups and always improving, cities can use these funds well. They can make plans that really help their communities.

“Addressing the complex challenge of community violence requires a commitment to funding new stakeholders and strategies, in addition to supporting proven approaches.”

Conclusion

This article presents a roadmap for reducing violence in the U.S. It offers strategies that cover alcohol policies, policing, education, and trauma care. These steps can help save lives and tackle violence at its roots.

To make these comprehensive violence reduction plans work, strong leadership is key. It also needs policy implementation from different sectors. And, it must focus on community needs and use data to guide decisions.

Working together is essential. Government, community groups, and advocates must share knowledge and work as one. This teamwork is vital for effective cross-sector collaboration in fighting violence.

As communities act on these suggestions, they must stay focused on their goal: a safer, fairer future. By keeping their eyes on saving lives and improving everyone’s well-being, they can lead the way. They can show other places how to reduce violence and build a peaceful future.

FAQ

What are some effective policy recommendations for reducing violence?

To reduce violence, we suggest several strategies. These include stricter alcohol rules, focusing police efforts, and raising the school dropout age. It’s also key to set clear violence reduction goals and identify key violence drivers.

Creating citywide plans and engaging high-risk individuals are also important. Addressing problem locations and emphasizing trauma-informed approaches can help. Investing in anti-violence programs and funding new strategies is crucial too.

How can stricter alcohol policies help reduce violence?

Stricter alcohol rules have been linked to less gun violence. Higher taxes on alcohol and fewer outlets can help. South Dakota’s 24/7 Sobriety program shows how alcohol offenders can be helped, leading to less violence.

What is hot-spot policing and how does it help reduce violence?

Hot-spot policing targets high-crime areas with more police presence. It works by partnering with the community to tackle crime hotspots. This approach has been shown to cut crime without pushing it elsewhere and is welcomed by the community.

What is focused deterrence policing and how does it work?

Focused deterrence policing targets specific crime issues, like gang violence. It warns individuals of legal and community consequences of violence. Offering social services as alternatives to violence has proven effective in reducing crime.

How can keeping kids in school longer help reduce violence?

Keeping kids in school longer can lower crime rates. A study found that extra time in school changes behavior for the better. This shows how education can help fight violence.

What should be the primary goal of any anti-violence effort?

The main goal should be to prevent lethal violence. City leaders should aim for a 10% drop in homicides and shootings each year. Tracking real results is key to measuring progress and keeping everyone accountable.

How can cities identify the key drivers of violence?

Cities must analyze the problem to find the main causes of violence. This includes looking at crime data and social networks. Working with street outreach workers helps confirm these findings and guide action.

What should a citywide plan for reducing violence include?

A city plan must be strategic and involve many groups. It should focus on the most at-risk areas and people. Using SMART goals and partnerships between police and communities is important for success.

How can cities engage individuals and groups at the highest risk of violence?

Engaging at-risk groups requires empathy and accountability. Outreach workers can help prevent violence and connect people to services. Cognitive behavioral therapy and focused deterrence strategies can also help reduce violence.

How can cities address violent micro-locations?

Addressing violent areas needs a mix of policing and investment. Working with residents and improving the environment can help. Long-term efforts in education and other areas are also key to reducing crime.

How can cities ensure long-term accountability for violence reduction efforts?

Cities should have a violence reduction unit in the mayor’s office. These units should manage services, funding, and coordination. Rewarding outcomes is key to their success over time.

Why is it important to emphasize healing through trauma-informed approaches?

Gun violence hits the poor and marginalized hard, causing trauma. Trauma-informed approaches are vital for healing and breaking cycles of violence. Understanding trauma and providing support is essential for recovery.

Why is it important to invest in the development of an anti-violence workforce?

Reducing violence needs a skilled workforce. Investing in community groups and training is crucial. This helps build a strong anti-violence team for the long term.

Why is it important to set aside funding for new stakeholders and strategies?

Fighting violence requires trying new approaches and funding new groups. Setting aside money for innovation helps. This keeps strategies fresh and responsive to changing violence patterns.

Source Links